My Life, the Ad
By Wil McCarthy
(Originally published in Speculations magazine)
Everything I do is an advertisement for
everything else I do. This article is an
advertisement for my other work: my novels and my nonfiction, my monthly column
for the SciFi channel. I also write for
WIRED, and a handful of other magazines.
Check out my website at www.wilmccarthy.com, or punch my name into your
favorite search engine or online bookstore.
Why? Because it'll teach you
something that took me twelve hard years to learn. Go on, look me up. See my reviews, see that I'm for real. Buy a New York Times Notable book.
Am
I emptily plugging my work? No, I'm
making a point about the nature of publicity.
Publicity isn't something that falls out of the sky or appears on the
shelves of your local department store.
It isn't even something you can buy, although many have tried. Quite simply, publicity is you. It's the extent to which you are interesting
or newsworthy. It's the market
penetration of the brand name you're striving to become.
Have
I got your attention? Good: that's the
whole point.
Almost
every week, I'll receive promotional
items from other writers, or from publishers, or from small presses or web
sites or whatever. The most pathetic of
these are the email Spams, but really a 4-color glossy postcard is the same
thing: yet another attempt to gain my attention, without offering anything in
return. Admittedly, sometimes I'll
respond to these. Sometimes I really
like the art, or a review excerpt catches my eye, or else I'll simply recognize
the name and feel a tug of curiosity.
But the vast majority of these things go in the trash without another
thought.
Am
I a jerk? Well, maybe. My friends and family don't think so, but
they're biased. Mostly I'm just very
busy, and don't have the time to process other people's advertising. This is hardly a unique opinion in America,
where most of us have seen a million commercials before we're old enough to
drink. We develop a kind of immune
system, a thick and slippery skin which repels any attempt to make us do or
think anything. Unless, of course, we've
initiated the contact ourselves.
Which
brings us back to the question: why am I telling you this? Because, amigos, I've engaged in this sort of
crude publicity myself. Postcards,
bookmarks, temporary tattoos, you name it.
Do they work? Well, kind of. Better than nothing, if nothing is your only
other alternative, which is often the case since publishers do little (or
nothing) for the books they haven't already pegged as bestsellers. But it takes a lot of time, and costs a lot
of money, and as I said, doesn't offer the audience any real incentive to pay
attention.
But
you're getting something out of this article, or you wouldn't still be reading
it. And do you know how much this cost
me? Less than zero, because of course I
get paid for my writing, while you've shelled out good money (or at least good
time) to read it. And it's a fair
transaction, because you're getting the benefit of my hard-earned experience,
and I'm getting a chance to raise my profile, and leave an impression in your
collective memory. That's
"Wil" with one "l", not two.
When
did my life become an advertisement for itself?
Ah, now here's the kicker: it always was. It always will be. It just took a long time for me to figure
that out. To some extent it's obvious,
or possibly even tautological; the better known you are, the better your work
will sell, because (a) people will be more aware of it, and (b) they'll have
some a priori idea about its style and content, and whether that appeals
to them. Your bibliography is an
advertisement for your future work. The
same is true in business, where workers advertise themselves with 1-page
summaries of their previous jobs.
What's
less obvious is the value of diversity.
A great deal of what I write is science fiction, and yet if the only
publicity I generate is through my backlist, then I'm only advertising to
people who already read or know about the sort of science fiction books I've
previously written. But here's where the
light began to dawn: my publishers have always made a big fuss about my being
an aerospace engineer, or "rocket scientist" in the parlance of
marketing types. Why? Because this is a kind of advertisement. It says something about me, about my
personality and character, and about where I'm coming from as a writer. Those two little words, "rocket
scientist," say more than two whole paragraphs about plot and character
and setting.
And
as it turns out, that door swings both ways.
My last two engineering jobs were won, at least in part, because I was a
science fiction writer. If my education
and experience stack up, this credential highlights my imagination and
communication skills -- both of which are important in engineering -- and also
implies some level of general intelligence, ambition, and ability to complete a
project. It's also a status symbol which
my employers figured they could capitalize on, in the same way that they like
to keep a few PhD scientists around.
It's an advertisement, in effect, of their own institutional vitality.
Now
a counterexample, again drawn from the pages of my career: my brief and
unspectacular foray into the field of mystery writing. Much of the SF I've written has a distinct
mystery or crime-drama bent to it, and one novel (MURDER IN THE SOLID STATE,
Tor/St. Martins, July '96, ISBN 0-812-55392-6) was explicitly a political/technological
thriller set in very-near-future Philadelphia and Washington D.C.. This book could conceivably have been
published as a mainstream novel with one of those spiffy black and gold and red
covers, but instead it was packaged and sold as "hard science
fiction," a bit of spin-doctoring which obscured the book's actual
content, and probably cut deeply into its potential readership. It did hit a couple of bestseller lists and
is still in print and available these six years later, so it was hardly an unmitigated
disaster, but I did definitely feel that the book had been hijacked.
Disillusioned,
I set out a few years later to write a straight mystery novel, set in
present-day Denver, Colorado. I had to
do it on spec, because mystery/thriller publishers were unimpressed, or perhaps
even disimpressed, with my science fiction credentials. And when I was finished, I had a terrible
time selling it, for two reasons. First,
although the story was contemporary it had a strong technological component,
and relied on a gimmick -- a 1960's fertility drug whose dangerous side effects
included high incidence of idential twins and triplets. In the story, the drug was never approved for
human use, and was consequently discontinued and forgotten. This is a perfectly plausible scenario --
things like it happen all the time -- but to the jaded and rather specialized
mystery publishers it sounded a lot like science fiction. Escaping your roots can be harder than you
think.
Second,
and more importantly, I was already known in the science fiction world. Mystery had never heard of me, and did not
see anything especially interesting about me.
I wasn't a lawyer or a cop or the mayor of a city, I'd never been
arrested or held hostage... My
background did nothing to advertise my mystery-writing insight or ability. In fact, my background shed actual doubts
about these. My publicity photo says it
all: short hair, aviator shades, and a jacket covered in mission patches from
the various rockets I've sent into space.
In the background is a hulking Titan Stage I Motor Assembly, a rocket
engine capable of generating half a million pounds of thrust. What does that guy know about the
seedy world of crime and corruption?
The
idea behind the novel was pretty spiffy -- at one point, a movie producer was
talking about maybe paying $1 million for it -- but in the end, the only
publishers I could find were science fiction publishers, who insisted (again)
on emphasizing its high-tech features and soft-peddling its real-world
setting. This would not have been a good
career move for me, because it would have alienated a good chunk of my SF
audience, without drawing in a single new reader from the mystery genre. In today's performance-driven marketplace,
that's death. So I packed up my
million-dollar idea and the year of work I'd invested in it, and stuffed them
in a steamer trunk, where they remain to this day.
The
words of a bygone editor came back to me in force: "If you want to write a
mystery novel, can't you set it on the moon?" Because that would advertise itself, yeah. Because the guy in that photo knows all about
the shifty, jealous world of the space program -- the bribery, the
corner-cutting, the constant struggle to be first or fastest or highest... No artist likes being typecast, but the
reasons for it go beyond the greed and laziness of corporations, and right to
the heart of human nature. You only get
to be one thing in the minds of the public, and unless you're lucky enough to
be "The Amazing Swiss-Army Renaissance Man," you're either typecast
or you're nobody. Sad, but there you
have it.
My
one thing was "Rocket Science Writer," and this had (and still has)
everything to do with the popularity of my fiction. Only after the mystery debacle did I finally
come to terms with this, and decide how best to exploit it. In retrospect, the solution seems obvious:
science fiction readers often enjoy science for its own sake, and conversely
there is a huge "science fandom" out there, millions strong, which
voraciously reads nonfiction and can, on occasion, be persuaded to pick up an
interesting novel. The overlap between
these two audiences is not nearly as important as the resonance, which
draws new readers from one side to the other.
So I started dabbling in science-oriented nonfiction.
The
results have been astounding. Today,
five years after my first nonfiction article, science journalism is a bigger
share of my income than science fiction is.
Not dry vanilla journalism, like you see in Science News, but the wonky,
gonzo sort where the writer has his facts straight and explains them clearly,
but also isn't afraid to extrapolate and expound on their future
implications. After two decades of
writing science fiction, I can spin this stuff out effortlessly, turning an
easy buck and also advertising, with every article, my linguistic and
speculative talents. Similarly, my
status as an acclaimed SF novelist is a draw for the sort of publications where
this sort of journalism is practiced.
Everything
advertises everything else. One hand
washes the other. Even my engineering
career has befitted: increasingly, work is finding me rather than the other way
around, and I'm free to pick and choose among the interesting projects. This is particularly true of my latest
endeavor, an invention called "programmable matter" which manipulates
the electrons of a material like silicon so that it can mimic other materials,
including metals, ceramics, magnets, and solar collectors. This deceptively simple idea has spawned a
science fiction series, a bouquet of articles culminiating in a nonfiction book
(HACKING MATTER, due March 2003 from Basic Books), and a pending U.S. patent
which the Air Force has already approached me about licensing. Now that's what I call advertising.
The
astute reader will note that this article, having nothing whatsoever to
do with rocket science or programmable matter, does not fit the pattern. This article cannot actually serve as an
effective advertisement. This is true,
up to a point; my "how to" stuff is mainly a forward-paying public
service, aimed at helping the next generation of writers avoid my own mistakes
and ignorances. But some fraction of the
people reading this will not only learn a useful datum or two, but will also be
intrigued by the product known as Wil McCarthy.
And that's the point: free publicity, or better yet, publicity that
turns an immediate profit.
We've
all got something to sell, some unique perspective on the world which others
will pay us for, if they know we exist.
My advice to all of you, and to you personally, is to figure out
what product your life is advertising, and to push that product hard, and to
keep in mind that when you do this, the product is also advertising you.